Robustness of Significant Dichotomous Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials in the Treatment of Patients with COVID-19: A Systematic Analysis.

Purpose: Significant results of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) should be properly weighed. This study adopted fragility index (FI) to evaluate the robustness of significant dichotomous outcomes from RCTs on coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) treatment. Materials and methods: ClinicalTrials.gov and PubMed were searched from inception to July 31, 2021. FIs were calculated and their distribution was depicted. FI's categorical influential factors were analyzed. Spearman correlation coefficient (r s) was reported for the relationship between FI and the continuous characteristics of RCTs. Results: Fifty RCTs with 120 outcomes in 7869 patients were included. The FI distribution was abnormal with median 3 (interquartile range 1-7, P = 0.0001). The FIs and robustness were affected by the outcomes of interest, various patient populations, and interventions (T = 18.215,16.667, 23.107; P = 0.02,0.0001, 0.001, respectively). A cubic relationship between the FIs and absolute difference of events between groups with R square of 0.848 (T = 215.828, P = 0.0001, R square = 0.865) was observed. A strong negative logarithmic relationship existed between FI and the P value with R square = - 0.834. Conclusion: The robustness of significant dichotomous outcomes of COVID-19 treatments was fragile and affected by the outcomes of interest, patients, interventions, P value, and absolute difference of events between the groups. FI was an useful quantitative metric for the binary significant outcomes on COVID-19 treatments. Registration: PROSPERO (CRD42021272455). Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s44231-022-00027-y.

Research advances and clinical management of bronchiectasis: Chinese perspective.

Bronchiectasis is a debilitating chronic suppurative airway disease that confers a substantial burden globally. Despite the notable prevalence, research on bronchiectasis in mainland China remains in its infancy. Nevertheless, there has been a significant leap in the quantity and quality of research, which has contributed to the ever-improving clinical practice. A nationwide collaborative platform has been established to foster multicentre studies, which will help increase the level of evidence further. Here, we summarise the status quo of clinical management and consider the research priorities for bronchiectasis that have been published previously. We also highlight the efforts of the Chinese medical communities to outline the core tasks that need to be addressed within the next decade.